Contribute to our community wiki at

Showing posts with label New York City Council. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York City Council. Show all posts

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Selecting the Next City Council Speaker

Next to the mayoral election, the most important election in NYC is one in which most voters will be locked out of the process: The selection of City Council Speaker is decided by Council members, not the public, and usually only after deals with the leaders of each borough's Democratic Party.

This is not a democratic process, and it shouldn't be allowed to play out when the next Speaker is selected after next year's municipal elections.

The Speaker of the City Council is the second-most powerful public official in New York City,and is the single individual with the institutional authority to stand up to the mayor, whoever that happens to be. Voters should insist that we have input into the selection of the next Speaker.

According to a recent story in The New York Observer, the early race for Speaker is shaping up as a battle between Council Members Mellissa Mark Viverto and Inez Dickens, who represent neighboring districts in Harlem. One unidentified council member described the differences between the two contenders this way: "It's rabble-rouser, change-the-whole-place left-wing Melissa, and old-school, old world, status quo Inez."

I urge voters and political activists to pose this question to City Council candidates: If you are elected, who will you support to become the next Speaker of the City Council? This decision is too important to be left to five Democratic Party leaders, or even to the 51 members of the City Council. The rest of us have a right to be heard on this momentous decision.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

New York City Council Lulus

It is disturbing enough that City Council Speaker Christine Quinn is able to buy loyalty - and thereby secure her reelection as Speaker - by awarding substantial lulus (stipends) to Council members who hold committee chairs and leadership positions.
But the hypocritical decision of some Council members to accept lulus after pledging not to do so in Citizens Union candidate questionnaires reflects an attitude best epitomized by golfer Tiger Woods: entitlement.
When career politicians shed their campaign promises once they are elected, and place self-interest above the public interest, they breed public cynicism and help to create an anti-incumbent climate in which voters turn against them.

Click the following link to read the Citizens Union report on City Council lulus, including a table which lists the positions of all City Council members on eliminating lulus, their actions in accepting/rejecting/donating lulus and the dollar amount of lulus that were awarded.
http://www.citizensunion.org/site_res_view_template.aspx?id=769c6383-59ce-4320-9f93-a0823f0d9891

Scott